Otolith shape analyses of Squalius cephalus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Actinopterygii: Cyprinidae) inhabiting four inland water bodies of the middle Black Sea region, Turkey
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aguirre, H. & Lombarte, A. 1999. Ecomorphological comparisons of sagittae in Mullus barbatus and M. surmuletus. Journal of Fish Biology 55: 105-114.
Avigliano, E.; Domanico, A.; Sánchez, S. & Velpado, A.V. 2017. Otolith elemental fingerprint and scale and otolith morphometry in Prochilodus lineatus provide identification of natal nurseries. Fisheries Research 186: 1-10.
Begg, G.A. & Brown, R.W. 2000. Stock identification of Haddock Melanogrammus aeglefinus on Georges Bank based on otolith shape analysis. Transactions of American Fisheries Society 129: 335-345.
Begg, G.A.; Overholtz, W.J. & Munroe, N.J. 2001. The use of internal otolith morphometrics for identification of Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) stocks on Georges Bank. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 99: 1-14.
Bostancı, D. 2009. Otolith biometry-body length relationships in four fish species (chub, pikeperch, crucian carp, and common carp). Journal of Freshwater Ecology 24(4): 619-624.
Bostancı, D.; Polat N.; Kurucu, G.; Yedier S.; Kontaş, S. & Darcın, M. 2015. Using otolith shape and morphometry to identify four Alburnus species (A. chalcoides, A. escherichii, A. mossulensis and A. tarichi) in Turkish inland waters. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 31(6): 1013-1022.
Boudinar, A.S.; Chaouı, L.; Quıgnard J.P.; Aurelle, D. & Kara M.H. 2016. Otolith shape analysis and mitochondrial DNA markers distinguish three sand smelt species in the Atherina boyeri species complex in western Mediterranean. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 182: 202-210.
Bourehail, N.; Morat, F.; Lecomte-Finiger, R. & Kara, M.H. 2015. Using otolith shape analysis to distinguish barracudas Sphyraena sphyraena and Sphyraena viridensis from the Algerian coast. Cybium 39(4): 271-278.
Camacho, J. 1995. Analisis multivariado con SPSS/PC+. EUB, Barcelona. 348 p.
Campana, S.E. & Casselman, J.M. 1993. Stock discrimination using otolith shape analysis. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 50: 1062-1083.
Campana, S.E. 1999. Chemistry and composition of fish otoliths: pathways, mechanisms and applications. Marine Ecology Progress Series 188(1): 263-297.
Cardinale, M.; Doering-Arjes, P.; Kastowsky, M. & Mosegaard, H. 2004. Effects of sex stock and environment on the shape of known-age Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) otoliths. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 61: 158-167.
Cejko, B.I. & Krejszeff, S. 2016. Sperm characteristics of chub Leuciscus cephalus (L.) collected in artificial condition after Ovopel and Ovaprim treatment. Aquatic Research 47(3):1-10.
Devries, D.A.; Churchill, B.G. & Prager, M.H. 2002. Using otolith shape analysis to distinguish eastern Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Ocean stocks of King Mackerel. Fisheries Research 57: 51-62.
Ferguson, G.J.; Ward, T.M. & Gillanders, B.M. 2011. Otolith shape and elemental composition: complementary tools for stock discrimination of mulloway (Argyrosomus japonicus) in southern Australia. Fisheries Research 110(1): 75-83.
Galley, E.A.; Wright, P.J. & Gibb, F.M. 2006. Combined methods of otolith shape analysis improve identification of spawning areas of Atlantic Cod. ICES Journal of Marine Science 63: 1710-171.
Geldiay, R. & Balık, S. 2007. Türkiye Tatlısu Balıkları. Bornova: Ege Üniversitesi Basımevi. 644 p.
Gierl, C. & Reichenbacher, B. 2015. A New Fossil Genus of Gobiiformes from the Miocene Characterized by a Mosaic Set of Characters. The American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists. Copeia 103(4): 792-805.
Hüssy, K.; Mosegaard, H.; Albertsen, C.M.; Neilsen, E. E.; Hemmer-Hansen, J. & Eero, M. 2016. Evaluation of otolith shape as a tool for stock discrimination in marine fishes using Baltic Sea cod as a case study. Fisheries Research 174: 210-218.
Ibáñez, A.L.; Hernández-Fraga, K. & Alvarez-Hernández S. 2017. Discrimination analysis of phenotypic stocks comparing fish otolith and scale shapes. Fisheries Research 185(1): 6-13.
Kottelat, M. 1997. European freshwater fishes. A heuristic checklist of the freshwater fishes of Europe (exclusive of former USSR), with an introduction for non-systematics and comments on nomenclature and conservation. Biologia (Bratislava) 52(5): 1-271.
Kurucu, G. & Bostancı, D. 2018. Using scanning electron microscopy and length-otolith size relationship for otolith morphological description of Capoeta banarescui Turan et al., 2006 and Squalius cephalus (L., 1758) (Actinopterygii: Cyprinidae) from Turkey. Acta Zoologica Bulgarica 70(1): 83-88.
L'abee-Lund, J.H. & Jensen, A.J. 1993. Otoliths as natural tags in the systematics of salmonids. Environmental Biology of Fishes 36: 389-393.
Lecomte-Finiger, R. 1992. The crystalline ultrastructure of otolith of the eel (A. anguilla L. 1758). Journal of Fish Biology 40: 181-190.
Mapp, J.; Hunter, E.; Van Der Kooıj J.; Songer, S. & Fisher, M. 2017. Otolith shape and size: the importance of age when determining indices for fish-stock separation. Fisheries Research 190: 43-52.
Montanini, S.; Stagioni M.; Benni, E. & Vallisneri, M. 2017. Ontogenetic changes in otolith morphology and shape analyses in Chelidonichthys cuculus (Linnaeus, 1758) and Chelidonichthys lucerna (L., 1758). Journal of Applied Ichthyology 33(2): 217-220.
Ozcan E. I.; Serdar, O. & Aydın, R. 2017. Length-weight and length-length relationships of Squalius cephalus (L., 1758) in Karasu River (Erzincan-Erzurum). Yunus Araştırma Bülteni 1(1): 109-114.
Ozulug, M. & Freyhof, J. 2011. Revision of the genus Squalius in Western and Central Anatolia, with description of four new species (Teleostei: Cyprinidae). Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters 22(2): 107-148.
Özpiçak Zengin, M.; Saygin, S.; Aydin, A.; Hançer, E.; Yilmaz, S. & Polat, N. 2018. The relationships between otolith dimensions-total length of chub (Squalius cephalus, L.1758) sampled from some inland waters of the Middle Black Sea Region. Journal of Limnology and Freshwater Fisheries Research, 4(1): 17-24.
Pavlov, D.A. 2016. Differentiation of three species of the genus Upeneus (Mullidae) based on otolith shape analysis. Journal of Ichthyology 56(1): 37-51.
Petursdottir, G.; Begg, G.A. & Marteinsdottir, G. 2006. Discrimination between Icelandic Cod (Gadus morhua L.) populations from adjacent spawning areas based on otolith growth and shape. Fisheries Research 80: 182-189.
Ponton, D. 2006. Is geometric morphometrics efficient for comparing otolith shape of different fish species? Journal of Morphology 267: 250-257.
Ramsay, J.O. & Silveman, B.W. 2005. Functional Data Analysis. 2nd ed, NewYork, USA, Springer. 310 p.
Reichenbacher, B.; Gaudant, J. & Griessemer T.W. 2007. A late Burdigalian gobiid fish, Gobius brevis (AGASSIZ, 1839), in the Upper Hydrobia Beds in the middle Upper Rhine Graben (W-Germany). Palaontologische Zeitschrift 81(4): 365-375.
Reichenbacher, B. & Cappetta, H. 1999. First evidence of an early Miocene marine teleostean fish fauna (otoliths) from La Paillade (Montpellier, France). Palaeovertebrata 28(1): 1-46.
Renán X.; Montero-Muñoz, J.; Garza-Pérez, J.R. & Brulé, T. 2016. Age and stock analysis using otolith shape in Gags from the Southern Gulf of Mexico. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 145(6): 1252-1265.
Russ, J.C. 1990. Computer-Assisted Microscopy: The Measurement and Analysis of Images. Plenum Press, New York. 453 p.
Skeljo, F. & Ferri, J. 2012. The use of otolith shape and morphometry for identification and size-estimation of five wrasse species in predator-prey studies. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 28: 524-530.
Stefanova, E.; Uzunova, E.; Hubenova T.; Vasileva P.; Terziyski D. & Iliev I. 2008. Age and growth of the chub Leuciscus cephalus L., from the Maritz River (South Bulgaria). Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 14(2): 214-220.
Tarkan, A.S.; Gürsoy Gaygusuz A.; Gaygusuz O. & Acıpınar H. 2007. Use of bone and otolith measures for size-estimation of in predator- prey selection. Folia Zoologica 56(3): 328-336.
Teimori, A. & Eslami A. 2017. Morphological-based variation of the fish populations using groupwise registration; applied to microscopic ımages of fish otolith using Aphanius dispar as a model. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology 41(4): 1083-1091.
Tuset, V.M.; Lombarte, A. & Assis, C.A. 2008. Otolith atlas for the western Mediterranean, north and central eastern Atlantic. Scientia Marina 72(S1): 7-198.
Tuset, V.M.; Lombarte, A.; González, J.A.; Pertusa J.F. & Lorente, M.J. 2003. Comparative morphology of the sagittal otolith in Serranus spp. Journal of Fish Biology 6(1): 1491-1504.
Tuset, V. M.; Rosin, P. L. & Lombarte, A. 2006. Sagittal otolith shape used in the identification of fishes of the genus Serranus. Fisheries Research 81: 316-325.
Vignon, M. & Morat F. 2010. Environmental and genetic determinant of otolith shape revealed by a non-indigenous tropical fish. Marine Ecology Progress Series 411(1): 231–241.
Wakefıeld, C.B.; Williams, A.J.; Newman, S.J.; Bunel, M.; Dowling, C.E.; Armstrong, C.A. & Langois, T.J. 2014. Rapid and reliable multivariate discrimination for two cryptic Eteline snappers using otolith morphometry. Fisheries Research 151: 100-106.
Watkinson, D.A. & Gillis, D.M. 2005. Stock discrimination of Lake Winnipeg Walleye based on Fourier and wavelet description of scale outline signals. Fisheries Research 72: 193-203.
Zengin, M.; Saygın, S. & Polat, N. 2015. Otolith shape analysis and dimensions of the anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus L. in the Black and Marmara Seas. Sains Malaysiana 44(1): 657-662.
Zhao, B.; Lıu J.; Song J.; Cao L. & Dou S. 2017. Otolith shape analysis for stock discrimination of two Collichthys genus croaker (Pieces: Sciaenidae,) from the northern Chinese coast. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology 36(3): 981-989.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.